Author: David Lopez

Progress drawdown reports are critical tools in construction project management, ensuring financial transparency and fostering trust among stakeholders. For financiers, these comprehensive snapshots provide essential insights into project status, financial health, and risk mitigation strategies. When properly implemented, progress reports enable financiers to monitor fund allocation throughout the construction lifecycle, verify that payments align with completed work, and identify potential issues before they escalate. By bridging communication gaps between contractors, developers, and clients, these reports create a shared understanding of project milestones and challenges.

Financial Oversight and Transparency

Fund Allocation Monitoring

The primary function of construction progress reports is to monitor fund allocation against completed work. Financiers receive detailed updates on completed tasks, associated costs, and projected expenses, creating a direct correlation between payments and actual progress. This level of transparency helps prevent discrepancies in billing by ensuring that contractors are fairly compensated for verified work while protecting financiers from overpayment. The resulting clarity maintains uninterrupted cash flow, a critical factor for project momentum.

Progress Payment Invoices

A system based on progress payment invoices transforms financial management in construction projects. Unlike broad phase-based billing, these invoices ensure precise payment tied to tangible outcomes and verified milestones. This approach benefits all stakeholders in the construction finance ecosystem—financiers gain confidence through visible progress, contractors receive timely compensation for completed work, and clients maintain budget control through verified expenditure.

Risk Mitigation Through Effective Reporting

Early Risk Identification

By offering a snapshot of the project’s current status, progress reports enable the early identification of risks such as delays or budget overruns. Financiers can analyse these reports to spot concerning trends, including schedule slippages, resource allocation issues, or unexpected expenses that might impact the project’s viability. Key performance indicators highlighted in these reports serve as early warning systems, alerting stakeholders to potential challenges while there’s still time to implement corrective measures.

Corrective Measures Implementation

The timely information provided through regular reporting empowers financiers to implement corrective actions promptly. When issues are identified, stakeholders can collaboratively develop intervention strategies to address specific challenges, whether they involve resource reallocation, timeline adjustments, or budget modifications. This proactive approach minimises adverse impacts on the project’s timeline and financial health, ensuring that minor setbacks don’t evolve into major disruptions.

Enhanced Stakeholder Communication

Bridging Information Gaps

Effective construction project management requires seamless information flow between all stakeholders, with progress reports serving as the primary conduit. These comprehensive documents ensure everyone remains informed about milestones achieved, challenges faced, and upcoming tasks in a format accessible to both technical and financial decision-makers. Financiers particularly benefit from the translation of complex construction activities into clear financial implications, enabling informed decisions about resource allocation and funding timelines.

Trust Building Through Transparency

Financial transparency established through consistent reporting creates an environment of trust among all project participants. When financiers and other stakeholders receive regular, accurate updates, they develop confidence in the project’s direction and management. This transparency reduces misunderstandings by creating a shared understanding of project realities and expectations. Professional relationships strengthen as contractors demonstrate their commitment to accountability through detailed progress claims and comprehensive documentation.

Legal and Professional Protection

Documentation of Project Progress

The comprehensive nature of progress reports creates an invaluable record of completed work and associated financial activities. These documents meticulously track the evolution of the project, capturing details about completed tasks, material usage, labour allocation, and corresponding payments. Financiers rely on this documentation to verify that disbursements align with actual progress, creating an audit trail that satisfies internal governance requirements and external regulatory obligations.

Dispute Prevention and Resolution

In the event of disagreements or formal disputes, properly maintained progress reports serve as authoritative evidence of what transpired during the construction process. These documents provide verification of completed work, approved changes, and payment histories that protect the interests of both contractors and financiers. By establishing a clear record of decisions, actions, and financial transactions, progress reports demonstrate due diligence and professional conduct from all parties involved, often preventing disputes from escalating to costly litigation.

Conclusion

Progress reports are indispensable tools for financiers in construction projects, ensuring financial transparency, mitigating risks, enhancing communication, and providing legal protection. By implementing best practices for reporting, construction teams can optimise their processes while maintaining stakeholder trust and satisfaction. Financiers who prioritise detailed progress reporting gain a competitive edge through enhanced accountability and efficient resource management throughout the project lifecycle.

Ready to Implement Professional Progress Reporting?

For expert assistance with progress claims and drawdown reports that meet the highest standards of quality and integrity, contact the registered quantity surveyors at Section 94 who specialise in comprehensive construction financial management documentation across Australia.

Cost reports play a pivotal role in streamlining the Development Application (DA) approval process for Melbourne property developers. With council approval delays costing developers an average of $15,000 per month, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Many builders and developers find themselves caught in frustrating bureaucratic limbo when applications are returned due to inadequate cost documentation. These delays aren’t just annoying—they’re profit killers. Professional quantity surveyor DA reports provide councils with independently verified construction costs that determine application fees, contributions, and bond requirements—ultimately fast-tracking approvals and keeping your project timeline on track.

Regulatory Framework & Requirements

The DA approval process in Melbourne operates within a complex regulatory landscape that demands meticulous attention to detail from developers and their consultants.

Melbourne Council Requirements

Understanding the specific requirements for cost reports across different municipalities is essential for successful project delivery. Construction cost verification directly influences statutory fees, with most councils calculating these as a percentage of verified project value. Developer contributions under Section 173 agreements similarly rely on accurate costings to determine appropriate levies for community infrastructure. Many Melbourne developers have faced costly delays when their applications were rejected due to inadequate financial documentation. Security bonds, another significant financial consideration, are calculated based on verified construction values, making professional quantity surveyor reports invaluable for optimising cash flow throughout the development cycle.

Compliance Elements

The Victorian Planning and Environment Act establishes strict parameters for development applications, including specific provisions regarding financial information. Most Melbourne councils now require certification from registered professionals rather than accepting developer-generated estimates. This shift reflects growing emphasis on transparency and accuracy in the DA approval process.

Attributes of Effective Cost Reporting

The quality and comprehensiveness of cost reports significantly impact the efficiency of the DA approval process. Developers who invest in superior documentation experience measurably faster approvals and fewer information requests.

Technical Accuracy

Professional construction cost verification requires meticulous attention to detail and market awareness. Effective reports must include itemised construction elements that break down expenses by building components rather than presenting only summary figures. Current Melbourne market rates must be accurately reflected, with prices specific to the project’s location and building type. Many developers underestimate the importance of regional variations in construction pricing, leading to challenges during council assessment. Contingency allocations must be both adequate and justifiable, typically ranging from 5-15% depending on project complexity and risk profile. Comprehensive staging considerations demonstrate to council assessors that financial planning has been thorough, particularly for multi-stage developments where cash flow management is critical.

Professional Certification Value

Certified quantity surveyor reports carry significant weight with approval authorities because they provide independent third-party validation. Compliance with AIQS standards ensures methodology consistency that council assessors can readily verify against established benchmarks. Risk mitigation represents another crucial benefit, as professionally certified documentation provides protection during inevitable challenges in the assessment process. This becomes particularly valuable during negotiations over developer contributions and Section 173 agreements, where financial implications can be substantial. Professional indemnity coverage provides additional security for both developers and councils, creating a shared confidence in the figures presented.

Tangible Benefits & Evidence

The impact of comprehensive cost reports on the DA approval process extends beyond mere compliance. Tangible benefits emerge when developers invest in quality documentation prepared by registered professionals.

Approval Acceleration

Statistical evidence from industry bodies confirms the significant time advantages gained through professional construction cost verification. Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) data reveals that applications with certified quantity surveyor reports experience 27% fewer disputes related to contribution calculations and fee assessments. This translates directly to faster approvals and project commencement. The Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) has similarly documented that developments with professional costings secure approvals in approximately 35% less time than those relying on developer-generated estimates.

Expedited assessment pathways become accessible when councils have confidence in the financial information provided. Many Melbourne municipalities now fast-track applications accompanied by certified costings from recognised practitioners. This preferential treatment reflects growing council reliance on third-party verification to manage assessment workloads efficiently. The dramatic reduction in information requests represents another measurable benefit, with research indicating up to 60% fewer clarification demands for applications supported by comprehensive cost reports.

“Stopped clock” avoidance constitutes perhaps the most valuable time-saving factor. When councils place applications on hold to request additional financial information, developers face costly delays that compound throughout the project lifecycle. Professional documentation minimises this risk by anticipating and addressing potential queries before submission.

Strategic Advantages

Negotiation leverage with councils emerges as a significant strategic benefit of detailed cost reports. When discussions regarding developer contributions and Section 173 agreements arise, independently verified costings provide credible baselines that strengthen the developer’s position. This advantage often results in more favourable contribution calculations that reflect genuine project impacts rather than arbitrary assessments.

Investor confidence enhancement represents an often-overlooked benefit of professional documentation. Funding partners and financial institutions increasingly scrutinise regulatory compliance and approval timelines when assessing project risk. Comprehensive DA approval documentation signals professionalism and thoroughness that resonates with sophisticated investors. Early identification of cost issues through detailed analysis allows for proactive design refinements before submission, avoiding costly redesigns during assessment. This preventative approach can save developers substantial amounts while maintaining project momentum.

Conclusion

Professional cost reports deliver exceptional return on investment by streamlining the DA approval process. Melbourne developers who prioritise quality documentation position themselves for success in a competitive landscape. For expert assistance with your next development, contact S94’s Quantity Surveyor services today on 0413 953 869 or email info@section94.com.au to ensure your construction cost verification meets council requirements and accelerates your project timeline.

Apartment defects have become a critical concern in Australia’s property landscape, with recent studies revealing that more than half of new residential buildings have at least one serious defect. From Sydney’s Opal Towers to Melbourne’s cladding crisis, building defects are costing owners hundreds of thousands in repairs and causing significant stress. Whether you’re dealing with water leaks, structural issues, or construction defects, understanding these problems is crucial for every property owner.

This guide from a residential quantity surveyor explores the most common apartment building defects, their implications, and what you can do to protect your investment in Australia’s growing multi-residential market.

Common Apartment Defects in Australia

Recent studies have revealed an alarming trend in apartment defects across major Australian cities, with more than half of new residential buildings reporting serious issues.

Most Common Building Issues

The latest NSW government strata survey has identified water-related problems as the leading concern in residential multi-owned properties. A staggering 42% of apartment buildings suffer from water ingress and inadequate waterproofing, particularly in bathrooms and balconies. These issues often manifest as persistent leaks, rising damp, and severe moisture penetration that can compromise the building’s integrity over time.

Structural Defects

Structural issues represent another significant category of building defects, affecting an equal proportion of properties. The most concerning manifestation is wall cracking, both internal and external, which often indicates deeper structural problems. Engineers report that concrete cancer has emerged as a particularly troubling issue in older apartment buildings, while foundation settlement continues to plague newer developments.

Building Envelope Concerns

The integrity of building envelopes has become a critical focus following recent combustible cladding discoveries. Defective roof coverings affect 23% of properties, while balcony deterioration and facade failures pose significant safety risks. These issues often require comprehensive remediation strategies, with costs averaging $331,829 per building.

Strata managers emphasise that professional building surveys and regular inspections are essential for early detection and cost-effective management of these defects.

Detection and Prevention of Apartment Defects

Understanding how to identify and prevent building defects has become crucial for property owners and investors in Australia’s apartment market.

Professional Assessment Methods

Building surveyors and qualified inspectors play a vital role in identifying potential construction defects before they escalate into major issues. A comprehensive building inspection typically involves a detailed assessment of structural elements, waterproofing systems, and safety compliance measures.

Warning Signs for Owners

Early detection of apartment defects often begins with visual indicators that property owners can monitor. Discoloration on walls or ceilings frequently signals water ingress, while unexpected cracking may indicate structural issues. Musty odours and peeling paint commonly suggest underlying waterproofing problems that require immediate attention.

Documentation Requirements

Private certifiers and building consultants must maintain detailed records of their inspections and findings. This documentation proves invaluable when pursuing warranty claims or dealing with building insurance matters. Property owners should ensure they receive comprehensive reports that detail any identified defects and recommended remediation strategies.

Prevention Strategies

Recent research indicates that up to 60% of defects stem from design issues rather than construction problems. Therefore, engaging qualified professionals during the pre-purchase phase and maintaining regular inspections throughout the building’s lifecycle represents the most effective prevention strategy. Strata managers recommend establishing a proactive maintenance schedule to identify potential issues before they develop into costly defects.

Legal Rights and Financial Implications

Understanding the financial and legal aspects of apartment defects has become increasingly important for property owners in Australia’s complex strata environment.

Owner Protections and Rights

Recent changes to strata legislation have strengthened owner protections against building defects. The statutory warranty period provides a critical window for owners to identify and report construction defects, with different timeframes applying to major and minor defects. Private certifiers and developers must now meet stricter compliance requirements, though building construction lawyers note that enforcement remains challenging.

Insurance Considerations

Strata insurance policies have evolved in response to the rising prevalence of defects. Most policies exclude cover for buildings with known defects within the property damage section, though liability coverage typically remains in place. Owners’ corporations should carefully review their insurance coverage and understand any exclusions related to building defects.

Financial Management

The Australian Taxation Office provides specific guidelines for claiming defect repairs and remediation costs. Property investors can often claim deductions for repairs and maintenance related to building defects, particularly when these form part of a special body corporate levy. However, certain capital works and major structural repairs may need to be depreciated over time rather than claimed as immediate deductions.

Cost Recovery Options

When structural defects or waterproofing issues emerge, owners have several pathways for cost recovery, including warranty claims, legal action against developers, and special levy contributions through the strata scheme.

Practical Tips and Future Outlook

The landscape of apartment defects in Australia continues to evolve, with regulatory reforms reshaping how the industry addresses building quality issues.

Industry Changes

Recent initiatives by the NSW Building Commissioner have strengthened oversight of construction practices, particularly in addressing waterproofing and structural defects. These reforms, combined with enhanced certification requirements, signal a positive shift toward better building standards. For current and prospective apartment owners, maintaining thorough documentation, engaging qualified building consultants, and participating actively in strata committees remain crucial for protecting their investments against future defects. Industry experts recommend regular professional inspections and prompt attention to maintenance issues as best practices for long-term property protection.

Do You Need a Residential Quantity Surveyor in Sydney?

Look no further than Section 94. We can help to ensure that your project is successful by providing construction cost management. With over a decade of experience in the construction industry, we can provide you with fast and accurate reports. At Section 94, we pride ourselves on our exceptional experience, clear communication, and fast turnaround times, we can assist with your construction budget needs.

Give us a call today at 0413 953 869 or email us at info@section94.com.au and we will get back to you.

The debate between modular vs traditional construction costs continues to heat up as Australia faces rising housing demands and construction expenses. With property prices soaring and construction timelines stretching longer than ever, many developers and homeowners are seeking quantity surveying services to evaluate the cost differences between modular and traditional construction methods. The construction industry has seen a significant shift towards innovative building approaches, with modular construction costs typically showing a 10-25% reduction compared to conventional methods. 

But what exactly drives these savings? From labour productivity and manufacturing efficiency to weather delays and site preparation costs, there’s more to consider than just the initial investment. Whether you’re a property developer managing large-scale projects or a homeowner planning your dream house, understanding the true cost comparison between modular and traditional construction is crucial for making an informed decision. Let’s dive into the key factors that influence the bottom line for both building methods. 

Direct Cost Comparisons 

Initial Costs 

Understanding the cost comparison between modular and traditional construction starts with analysing upfront expenses. While traditional construction typically has a steady flow of costs throughout the project, modular methods tend to front-load expenses through factory production of the components. The base construction expenses encompass several key areas, including material procurement and storage systems, dedicated labour teams and specialised trades, essential equipment and machinery requirements, and project management overheads. 

Material Costs 

Material efficiency plays a crucial role in examining modular vs. traditional construction costs. The factory-based production of material components typically results in significant savings through bulk purchasing opportunities and centralised inventory control. This controlled setting reduces material wastage—often by up to 30% less than traditional methods—while making it possible for material usage tracking to be standardised throughout the production process. 

Timeline-Related Costs 

Project Duration Impact 

The cost difference between modular and traditional construction becomes particularly evident when considering time-related expenses. Manufacturing efficiency in modular projects can reduce construction timelines by 30-50%, creating significant cost savings. This efficiency stems from several factors, including optimised on-site labour hours, minimal weather-related delays, the ability to conduct parallel construction activities, and earlier time to revenue generation for the completed project. 

Labour Efficiency Considerations 

Labour productivity varies significantly between methods, with each approach offering its advantages. Traditional construction relies on extended on-site teams working in variable conditions, while modular construction leverages the consistency of factory-based skilled workers. Weather conditions have a more substantial impact on traditional labour hours, whereas factory settings enable steady, predictable work output regardless of external conditions. 

Additional Cost Factors 

Transportation and Logistics 

When calculating total modular vs traditional construction costs, transport logistics play a crucial role. Traditional construction involves regular deliveries of materials to the site, while modular projects require specialised transportation of completed modules. This includes considerations such as securing appropriate heavy vehicle access, detailed route planning for oversized loads, managing special permit requirements, and coordinating crane operations for module placement. 

Site Accessibility Impact 

The cost comparison between modular and traditional construction can vary significantly based on site conditions. Remote or difficult-to-access locations might present unique challenges for module delivery, requiring careful planning and specialised equipment for successful implementation. 

Site-Related Expenses 

Site preparation costs affect both methods differently. For modular construction, thorough preparation is essential and includes several critical elements. The foundation must be precisely prepared to accommodate modular installation, with service connection points positioned exactly where needed. Additionally, proper crane pad preparation and access roads must be established, along with any necessary temporary storage areas for materials and equipment. 

Connection Requirements 

The final phase of connecting services significantly influences overall project costs. This includes coordinating electrical and plumbing connection points, ensuring smooth integration of building systems, managing foundation interfacing, and implementing proper weather sealing between modules. These elements require careful planning and execution to maintain both efficiency and quality in the final structure. 

Long-Term Financial Considerations 

Quality and Durability Factors 

When evaluating modular vs traditional construction costs, we also need to consider long-term performance factors. Factory-based manufacturing processes typically ensure consistent quality control, potentially reducing future maintenance expenses. The controlled environment enables precise quality control standards, weather-protected assembly, and standardised material usage, all supported by rigorous inspection processes throughout the manufacturing process. 

Resale Value Implications 

The cost comparison between modular and traditional construction extends well beyond the initial build. Modern modular constructions are challenging previous market perceptions, with many projects showing comparable or superior property value appreciation. Strong construction quality documentation, inherent design flexibility for future modifications, impressive energy efficiency ratings, and comprehensive structural warranty coverage all contribute to maintaining long-term value. 

Market Performance 

Several factors influence the long-term value of modular construction, and the benefits often continue throughout the building’s lifecycle. While traditional construction methods have a long-established track record, modern modular buildings are demonstrating excellent durability and maintaining strong resale values. This is particularly evident in markets where quality and sustainability are highly valued, with modular construction meeting or exceeding performance expectations. 

Project-Specific Variables 

Design Complexity 

The cost comparison between modular and traditional construction varies significantly based on project requirements. Custom architectural features and complex designs can impact manufacturing efficiency and overall costs differently for each method. Project success often depends on balancing customisation requirements with engineering specifications while maximising design standardisation opportunities where appropriate. 

Location Factors 

Regional variations play a crucial role in determining modular vs traditional construction costs. Local building codes and regulations, climate considerations for transportation, site accessibility challenges, and regional labour market conditions all influence the final cost structure. Understanding these variables is essential for accurate project planning and budgeting. 

Need Help with Your Project? 

With over a decade of industry experience, Section 94 qualified building quantity surveyors are AIQS certified with a fast turnaround time and clear communication. Give us a call today at 0413 953 869 or email us at info@section94.com.au to discuss our quality budget services for residential and commercial builds. 

Frequently Asked Questions 

Q: What is the typical cost difference between modular and traditional construction? 

A: Modular construction typically offers cost savings of 10-25% compared to traditional methods. These savings stem from increased manufacturing efficiency, reduced labour costs, and shorter construction timelines. However, actual savings vary based on project scope, location, and complexity. 

Q: How does weather affect the cost of each construction method? 

A: Traditional construction is significantly impacted by weather delays, potentially increasing costs through extended timelines and labour charges. Modular construction’s factory-based approach minimises weather-related delays, with only the final installation phase affected by weather conditions. 

Q: Are modular homes harder to finance than traditional construction? 

A: While financing processes differ, many Australian lenders now offer specific modular construction loans. The key difference lies in the payment structure, which typically follows factory milestones rather than traditional construction progress payments. 

Q: What hidden costs should I consider with modular construction? 

A: Important considerations include transportation and crane hire expenses, specific site preparation requirements, specialised foundation specifications, service connection costs, and potential permits for oversized loads. Understanding these factors early in the planning process helps ensure accurate budgeting. 

Q: How do transportation costs affect overall modular construction expenses? 

A: Transportation costs are influenced by several key factors, including the distance from factory to site, module dimensions and weight specifications, site accessibility conditions, special permit requirements, and necessary crane and equipment arrangements. Careful planning of these logistics helps optimise overall project costs. 

Q: Can modular construction save money on large-scale projects? 

A: Large-scale projects often realise significant cost benefits through modular construction methods. These advantages come from manufacturing economies of scale, reduced project timelines, consistent quality control processes, optimised labour costs, and minimal site disruption. The combination of these factors typically results in notable cost savings for larger developments. 

Project managers must always remain vigilant. In addition to monitoring team behaviour and ensuring the quality of deliverables, depending on the approach, they also need to be mindful of project budget overruns. Quantity surveyor reports can be instrumental in identifying potential risks early and keeping the project on track financially. Since excessive project costs can lead to disastrous consequences, including failure, it’s crucial to know how to prevent them and stay as far as possible from overspending.

Not sure where to start? Do not worry! The following tips include the best practices and insights that managers and leaders can adopt to avoid cost overruns in project management. Check them out!

1. Always Plan Before You Execute

Pre-planning may make some individuals anxious – but it’s essential for avoiding project cost overruns. When there is a clear forecast of what will be done and the costs associated with each stage, supported by quantity surveyor reports, it becomes much easier to adhere to the budget and meet expectations.

Ideally, when planning, avoid being overly optimistic or pessimistic. An overly optimistic approach can lead to unexpected project cost overruns. Conversely, overly pessimistic budgets may prove unfeasible, as they often involve exorbitant and sometimes impossible resources, making viability a challenge, especially for complex projects.

For this reason, aim for balance and create a cost management plan that reflects reality. Use real (and recent) data and research to substantiate the stated figures, avoiding assumptions.

2. Be Careful with Changes to The Project Scope

Sometimes, to align work with team preferences or final requirements, managers may make too many changes to the original scope – leading to project cost overruns.

Try to align daily activities with the original plan and carefully consider the overall picture before making changes that incur avoidable expenses. Always discuss significant changes with the project stakeholders – especially when they involve substantial costs and deviations – to avoid future confusion and misunderstandings.

3. Constantly Monitor Project Progress

Without a doubt, one of the best ways to avoid project cost overruns is through frequent monitoring. When a manager and their team closely follow the progress of work, it becomes easier to identify issues that could compromise the project’s schedule and cost. Using tools like quantity surveyor reports ensures that you have clear visibility of financial performance at every stage.

4. Use Comprehensive Software to Track Expenses and Forecasts

One of the biggest challenges for project managers when it comes to costs is balancing expenses with the budget to avoid overspending. But how can you do this if you don’t even track what’s being spent on each activity or stage? Or how much was allocated for it?

It’s essential to constantly monitor project income and expenditure.

You can maintain full control by using tools that provide detailed overviews of costs, and quantity surveyor reports can help support these efforts, ensuring accountability and adherence to the budget.

5. Be Cautious When Contracting Suppliers

Does your project rely on external suppliers for successful completion? Whether for labour or material supply? If so, be mindful of how such agreements are made and stay prepared!

Before signing a contract, check with the supplier about their limits and how far demands can be met, ensuring the partnership is viable.

6. Identify What Causes Cost Overruns in Your Project

If things go off track and events lead to excessive project costs, it is crucial to pinpoint the barriers preventing balance. Referring to quantity surveyor reports can help identify the root causes, whether it’s inaccurate calculations, scope changes, or unforeseen expenses. This step is essential for creating actionable solutions.

7. Communicate Costs to The Team and Discuss Priorities

It is common for managers to avoid sharing project costs or budget cuts with the team to prevent demotivation. However, when managing project expenses, it is essential that the team understands priorities and availability.

Transparency fosters conscious spending, promotes teamwork, and adds positive value to the collective relationship.

8. Be Ready to Reallocate Resources as Needed

Facing project cost overruns? Not all is lost! Minimise spending to return to budget by reallocating resources.
This is particularly relevant for human capital.

Redirecting highly qualified professionals to the project can improve efficiency and productivity, reducing long-term project costs despite higher initial investment.

Do You Need Help with Your Project?

With over a decade of industry experience, Section 94 qualified building quantity surveyors are AIQS certified with a fast turnaround time and clear communication. Give us a call today at 0413 953 869 or email us at info@section94.com.au to discuss our quality budget services for residential and commercial builds.